iHerb
SponsoredWorld's largest store for natural supplements and health foods.
Learn more →Enter the weight you lifted and how many reps you completed. The calculator returns five different 1RM estimates and a table of recommended weights for various rep ranges (1RM, 5RM, 10RM, etc.) for programming.
| Reps | % | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100% | 114.6 |
| 2 | 95% | 108.8 |
| 3 | 92% | 105.4 |
| 4 | 89% | 102 |
| 5 | 86% | 98.5 |
| 6 | 83% | 95.1 |
| 7 | 80% | 91.7 |
| 8 | 78% | 89.4 |
| 9 | 75% | 85.9 |
| 10 | 73% | 83.6 |
| 12 | 70% | 80.2 |
| 15 | 65% | 74.5 |
Your one-rep max (1RM) is the heaviest weight you can lift for a single repetition with proper form. It's the gold standard for measuring strength and the basis for percentage-based programming (5×5 at 80%, 3×3 at 90%, etc.). Many lifters never test their 1RM directly because the attempt is fatiguing and risky — instead they estimate it from submaximal lifts.
Estimating from a 5-rep set or 8-rep set has been validated against actual 1RM tests in multiple studies. Within ±5% accuracy is typical for sets of 1-10 reps. Above 10 reps, accuracy drops because endurance becomes a factor and form often breaks down.
Each formula was validated on different populations and exercises, so each has slight biases. Averaging gives a more robust estimate.
Epley (1985): w × (1 + reps/30). Most popular; tends to overestimate slightly at high reps. Often the default in fitness apps.
Brzycki (1993): w × 36 / (37 − reps). Conservative; tends to be lower than Epley. Used in NSCA literature.
Lombardi: w × reps^0.10. The most aggressive at high reps; less commonly used.
O'Conner: w × (1 + 0.025 × reps). Linear; simplest to compute mentally.
Lander: 100w / (101.3 − 2.67123 × reps). Used in the bench-press research that produced the formula.
Once you know your 1RM, the percentage table tells you what weight to use for various rep ranges. 5×5 work is typically done at 80-85% of 1RM (about 5RM weight); 3×3 strength sets at 90% (3RM); pyramids might hit 70% for 10s, 80% for 5s, 90% for 3s.
These percentages are starting points. If your last set leaves you with 2-3 reps in reserve, the weight is right. If you grind out reps and the weight crushes you, drop 5-10%. If you bang out double the prescribed reps easily, your 1RM is higher than estimated and you should retest.
Within ±5% for honest sets of 1-10 reps. Above 10 reps, accuracy drops because endurance and technical breakdown become factors. For strength athletes, retest 1RM every 8-12 weeks instead of estimating.
Powerlifters and athletes do, in controlled meets or test days. Recreational lifters often skip — estimating from a 3-5RM set is safer and gives 95% of the information.
Each was developed on different exercise populations. Bench press 1RM might be best modeled by Brzycki, squat by Epley. Averaging across all 5 reduces bias toward any single exercise.
No. Each lift has its own 1RM. A 100 kg bench press doesn't tell you anything about your squat 1RM. Test/estimate each main lift separately.
Every 4-8 weeks for serious lifters, or whenever you significantly outperform your previous estimate. If 80% of your old 1RM feels light, retest.
Yes for unilateral or stable-grip exercises. Less applicable for ballistic exercises (kettlebell swings, snatches) where the mechanics differ from a heavy single rep.
The estimate becomes unreliable. Switch to a heavier weight that limits you to 8-12 reps for accurate 1RM estimation.
No. Calculation runs locally; nothing is sent to a server.
World's largest store for natural supplements and health foods.
Learn more →This tool is for general information only and is not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Consult a qualified healthcare professional about your health.